
The salt was to be obtained by the Syndicate exclusively from the salines or salt deposits of Mex in the western part of Lake Mariout, and the sole right to export the salt so obtained was conferred on the Syndicate. Thereafter an English syndicate, known as the Egyptian Syndicate Limited, acquired the undertaking of the Egyptian Soda Company, including its Wadi-Natron concession, and shortly afterwards entered into an agreement with the Egyptian Government whereby the latter ratified the transfer to the Syndicate of the Egyptian Soda Company's Wadi-Natron concession and further conferred on the Syndicate the Government's monopoly right of manufacturing and selling salt in Egypt, the two concessions to be merged into one in the hands of the Syndicate.

The concession expressly stipulated that the Egyptian Soda Company should on no account sell or export salt, this being a monopoly of the State. This concession conferred on the Egyptian Soda Company the exclusive right to exploit the minerals and natural products in the lands or lakes of a domain known as Wadi-Natron, which is situated to the west of the Nile in lower Egypt, and in particular to manufacture and export soda. In 1897 an Egyptian limited company, the Societe Anonyme des Soudes Naturelles d'Egypte, which it will be convenient to call "the Egyptian Soda Company," was formed to operate a concession obtained by it from the Egyptian Government. It appears that by decree of 26th August 1886, the Khedive established a monopoly in Egypt of the extraction, manufacture and sale of salt and natron or native sodium carbonate. From these the essential facts may be briefly extracted. To place the controversy in its due setting it is necessary to refer to the agreed documents in the case. The present appeal is against the order so obtained.


The respondent company is a shareholder of the appellant company and as such asks and has obtained from His Britannic Majesty's Supreme Court for Egypt, an injunction restraining the appellant company from engaging in this branch of business.

The sole question at issue in this appeal is whether it is permissible for the appellant company, having regard to the terms of its Memorandum of Association, to engage in the business of exporting salt from Egypt.
